Pages

Wednesday 22 March 2017

Paper- 7 Literary Theory and Criticism western-2

To evaluate my assignment click here.

Name: Komal Shahedadpuri M.
Course: M.A English
Sem: 2
Batch: 2016-2018
Enrolment No: 2069108420170027
Submitted to: Smt. S.B Gardi Dept. of English MKBU
Paper No: 7 Literary Theory and Criticism – Western-2
Topic: Dhvani (sound), Structure of Poetic meaning

Indian Poetics

    What is Indian Criticism? Ask yourself what is that, meet with yourself. Sometimes We know the text but don’t know context of particular thing. What we would read from a book is only story. When we encounter with  literature it give us pleasure, so what are ingredients or components of literature? that is a question, how elements are connected that we should think as we are the students of literature, its our responsibility, we are answerable and can understand the process of literature to provide pleasure. We have to go deep into the mystery of that. When we hear a story we visualize it because we have seen many things and its change from person to person. Can we see what Sculpture see in the stone?

     The major difference between Western and Indian Criticism is that Western criticism talks about the effect of literature while Indian criticism talks about the process that how literature effect us and provide pleasure. Intelligent men get pleasure from poetics while fool waste their time in sleeping and leisure.  Can we see the difference among Bharat, Anandvardhana, Kuntak, Mammat, Vaman etc.

Classification of Literary theories

1.    Language, Alankara (principle of figurativeness) and Vakrokti (principle of deviation)
2.    Style and compositional value, Guna/Dosa (excellence and faults) ,Riti (mode of expression) and Auchitya (propriety)
3.    Verbal Symbolism, Dhvani
4.    Aesthetic experience, Rasa
5.    Narrative, Mahavakya
6.    Discourse analysis, Yuktis
7.    Comprehensive analysis

‘Dhvani’, Structure of poetic meaning
Image result for images of a book Anandvarghan's dhvanyalok     
                                                                                                                            The concept of Dhvani, is an original contribution of the Alankarika to Indian thought. The term dhvani is used in more than one sense in this context. It  is stated that the inspiration  came from the science of grammer. Next only to Rasa theory in importance, the dhvani theory of Anandvardhana considers suggestion, the indirectly evoked meaning , as the characteristics of property discourse. As articulated in Dhvanyaloka , dhvani becomes an all embracing principles that explains structure and function of other major elements of literature. All the subsequent literary theories in  the tradition found the combination of Rasa and Dhvani theories both sufficient for analysis the constitution of meaning  in literature. In Dhvanyaloka, Anandvardhana has presented a structural analysis of indirect literary meaning. He has classified different kinds of suggestions.
     
      Where is speed ,there is Dhvani, and Speed is a reason of Dhvani. It is not speed of breathing. Language is the medium of literature, but without the science of language, how the criticism is possible? There is no any meaning of word, meaning is implied to it.(imposed meaning) We imposed meaning to language like if someone is late we say , why today  you are so early? its a dhvani. Always we are in search of getting Dhvani but everybody can’t understand same thing. For Example, in Abhigyanshakuntala, Dushyanta left Shakuntala , Sarvadaman, son of Dushyanta and Shakuntala was playing with lion. At that time, Shakuntala came out of Ashram and ask to one Tapsi to bring ‘Shankut’ (peacock) and  said ‘ See the elegance of Shakunt’,  (शंकुत: लावन्यम प्रेक्षस्व:)  it’s a strength of a word ,from which we get pleasure of literature through the Dhvani of it.
      
           In Todorov’s view, Anandvardhana “was perhaps a greatest of all theorists of textual symbolism” (1982-12). If we are able to explain how indirect meaning arise systematically, we are able to claim that all potential meanings are inherent in the text. No doubt the text constitutes itself in each instance of reading but this constitution based in a finite system. Anandvarghana uses the term dhvani to designate the universe of suggestion- Dhvani is a soul of poetry. (Kavyasya atma dhvani).  The Indian grammarian used the term, dhvani in connection with his  theory of sphota, the concept of sphota arose out of the need to explain  how individual letters form a meaningful world.                                                                                                   Related image          
     
           In Anandvarghan’s view, it is this structure, which is the total effect of the suggestive quality of language, that distinguishes  poetry from the ordinary usage of language. It is not understand by a mere learning in grammar and in dictionary. It is understood only by those whohave an insight into the true significance of poetry. He chosen the term dhvani following the definite use of that term by the grammarians to define 1) The sound structure of words (sabda), 2) the semantic aspect of sabda 3) the suggested meaning as such and the process of suggestion involved. Dhvani  is a theory of meaning ,of symbolism and this principle leads to the poetry of suggestion being accepted as the highest king of poetry.
     
     A kind of poetry, wherein the meaning renders itself secondary or the word renders its meaning secondary and suggests the implied meaning ,is designated by the learned as dhvani or ‘Suggestive Poetry’. Suggestion does not bear identity with indication because there is difference between the two. ‘Merged in the other meaning’ and ‘ Completely lost’ – these are the two kings of the expressed in ‘ ‘Suggestion with intended literal meaning.’ Anandvardhana proposed three levels of meaning.

 
મીઠા મધુને મીઠા મેહુલા રે લોલ
મીઠા મેહુલા # લાક્ષણા
થી મીઠીરે મારી માત રે # વ્યંજીત છે. વ્યંજના.
  
In this example we can find the these all the three levels of meaning. Another example is

બારી ઉઘાડી છે # મગજ ઉઘાડું છે. 
ઘઉં દળાવ્યા # લોટ દળાવ્યો.

           As mention that a word has three functions: it signifies or denotes(abhidh), it indicates(laksana) and it suggest (vyanjana). The meaning that is comprehended immediately after the  word is utter is its  primary meaning (mukhya-arth). The meaning thus conveyed and its relation to the next word and its own meaning is a mutual relation of the signifier and the signified (vachya- vachaka). The power that creates the relation among words is Abhidha –vyapara, the power of dnotation or sense. The suggestive power of the word is through Vyanjana artha. Of this Vyanjana-artha which is the suggested sense or the essence of the word is most interesting and is much debated. This is based in the principle  that the meaning of word is not limited to its literal sense, the word has the power to reach beyond the obvious.    
      
      This is Anandvarghana’s contribution, to add third level- rather to split the indirectly expressed meaning into two. For the Rgveda also makes a distinction between the literal meaning and the insignificance – “ He sees but sees not … one hears but hears not”. Besides the literal meaning, there is socio-cultural meaning depends on the contexts and emotions. The words, expressive as well as indicatory signs respectively.

Types of Dhvani


Varieties of Dhvani
                                      As suggested sense, or what is suggested (vyangya) : When what is suggested is a fact (vastu), whether of nature or of human affairs, it may be a thing occurrence is implied. it is called Vastu Dhvani. When a fact, which has been idealized and transformed into an image (alankaras) is suggested, it is called Alankara Dhvani. The third  type of dhvani is the most important. An emotion (bhava) can only be suggested and not described. When a permanent emotion is suggested , the suggested sense is called Bhava- dhvani, is given the name Rasa dhvani because the sthyibhav culminates in Rasa.
         
    Dhvani denotes
1.    The sound structure of words (sabda)
2.    The semantic aspects of sanda, the vyanjakas or suggesters
3.    ‘the revealed or suggested meaning as such and the process of suggestion involved’
        
        The Dhvani theory of meaning came in for criticism at the hands of nyaya and mimansa thinkers. The opponents said that
1.    Dhvani is nonexixtent
2.    Dhvani is a product of inference and is to be included under the Laksana
3.    Dhvani is something beyond the realm of words
       
       Mahimabhatta is the most well-known critic of this theory. But dhvani is not laksana, it can evoked by an idea, a figure of speech or even emotion. Even in the absence of laksana, the word Ganga can suggest purity  and sanctity. The goal is development of rasa- mere suggestion does not make poetry, for example, the use of “He is a Villager” to suggest his nonurban manners.
            
        Thus, this focus on meaning and the type of meaning in the poetry must be considered as a major  contribution of Anandvardhana to Indian theory. Further, the dhvani theory has both clucidated and strengthened the Rasa theory and the two together constitute a powerful explanatory framework. Finaly, this theory of verbal symbolism enriched the system of interpretation of texts by making possible a method of symbol exegesis.

 References

Blog on Indian Poetics by Parth Bhatt
Ppt of Kinjal Patel
A book, Indian Literary Criticism by G. N Devy
englishliteratureforcollagestudentsblogspot.com
 Study material
     



   

No comments:

Post a Comment

Paper- 15 Parallel Cinema and Commercial Cinema

To evaluate my Assignment  Click Here Topic: Parallel Cinema and Commercial Cinema Prepared by: Komal Shahedapuri              ...